← Cases

Hechter et al. v. Thurston

[1980] 2 SCR 254 Court SCC Decision date 1980-10-21 English

PartiesWilliam Samuel Hechter and David William Gordon Reycraft (Plaintiffs) Appellants·Harold Elmer Thurston (Defendant) Respondent

Counsel (4)
A.H. Adam and M. Newman, for the plaintiffs, appellants.
D.A. Booth, for the defendant, respondent.
Solicitors for the plaintiffs, appellants: Norton, Schwartz, McJannet, Weinberg, Winnipeg.
Solicitors for the defendant, respondent: Allen & Booth, Winnipeg.

Judges Laskin, Bora; Ritchie, Roland Almon; Dickson, Robert George Brian; McIntyre, William Rogers; Chouinard, Julien

Delivered by Majority

On appeal from Manitoba

Subjects Sale

Contents

The judgment of the Court was delivered orally by

THE CHIEF JUSTICE—We are all of the opinion that this appeal should be allowed, the judgment of the Manitoba Court of Appeal set aside and the award of damages by Nitikman J. in favour of the plaintiffs restored. The contract in question here did not make time of the essence, and it is clear that the vendor had accepted the conditions of the contract as terms thereof imposing obligations upon him. This contract does not involve, therefore, any question raised by the cases dealing with what has been called “true conditions precedent”. In the circumstances, the vendor was in default in carrying out his obligations and, indeed, was guilty of a premature repudiation. The appellants are entitled to costs in this Court. We leave the costs at trial undisturbed and award no costs in the Court of Appeal.
[Page 255]
Judgment accordingly.
Solicitors for the plaintiffs, appellants: Norton, Schwartz, McJannet, Weinberg, Winnipeg.
Solicitors for the defendant, respondent: Allen & Booth, Winnipeg.

Footnotes

  1. [1] [1979] 3 W.W.R. 172.