Majority
Headnote
Croods were sold at auction, in the city of JVew-York, to be paid for in approved indorsed notes at four and six months; and it is the usage in that city, where goods are so sold, to deliver them to the buyer when called for, and for the vendors afterwards to send for the notes. The vendee, after he had received the goods, before he was called on for the notes, according to the terms of the sale, stopped payment, and assigned over the goods, with other property, in trust, to pay certain favoured creditors : Held, that the delivery of . the goods by the vendors, was conditional, and the vendee a trustee for them until the notes were delivered. That the assignment by the vendee was voluntary and fraudulent, and did not defeat the equitable Hen of the vendors; there being no intervening purchaser for a valuable consideration, without notice.Upon this ease, I am of opinion, that the defendants must account for those proceeds to the plaintiffs. The delivery of the goods was conditional, and taken by the defendant, P., as a trustee for the plaintiffs, until the delivery of the notes. The voluntary assignment and delivery of these goods, in the character of an insolvent debtor, to J. 8f H, to pay other creditors, was an act of fraud, and ought not to deprive the plaintiffs of their equitable lien, in a case where there is no intervening claim of a purchaser for valuable consideration. If the goods had been fairly sold by P., or if the proceeds had been actually appropriated by the assignees, before notice of this suit, and of the injunction, the remedy would have been gone; But while the goods are in the possession, or
I shall accordingly decree, that the assignees, J. &c Pf. account for the proceeds in their possession.
Decree accordingly.