← Cases

In re the Estate of Ximenez

107 Misc. 460 Court N.Y. Sur. Ct. English

Contents

Majority

p. 460
Matter of the Estate of Fernando Staud y Ximenez, Deceased.
(Surrogate’s Court, New York County,
June, 1919.)

Headnote

Executors and administrators — responsibility of administrator in disposing of patent rights — when order authorizing administrator to sell denied.
An administrator must assume the responsibility of disposing of certain patent rights which belong to the estate, with ordinary business prudence, and in the absence of exceptional or unusual circumstances, his application for an order authorizing him to sell such patent rights will be denied.
Application by an administrator for authority to sell certain patent rights belonging to estate of deceased.
William Donahue, for petitioner.

This is an application by His Excellency F. Javier Salas, the Spanish consul-general at the port of New York, who is also the administrator herein, for order authorizing and permitting him as such administrator to sell certain patent rights which belong to this estate. All the facts concerning the proposed sale are set forth in the petition, but it is unnecessary to allude to them in detail. It will suffice to say that applications of this character are only granted by the surrogate when it appears that such unusual or peculiar circumstances exist as would render it inadvisable or inexpedient on the part of a personal representative of an estate to dispose of property belonging to an estate in the ordinary manner upon the administrator’s own responsibility. Such matters should be left to the discretion of the representative of the estate, and it is only where exceptional circumstances exist that the surrogate should exercise

p. 461
the authority conferred upon him by section 2685 of the Code of Civil Procedure. Matter of Goldfarb, 93 Misc. Rep. 401 ; Matter of Schleif, 169 N. Y. Supp. 814 . No exceptional or unusual circumstances exist in respect to this matter. The administrator therefore should assume the responsibility of his position and dispose of the property to the best of his ability and with ordinary business prudence.

Application denied.

Cases cited