Hyperlawhypertext legal databasebeta Solarz v. Manhattan Railway Co. 11 Misc. 715

← Cases

Solarz v. Manhattan Railway Co.

11 Misc. 715 Court N.Y. Super. Ct. English

Contents

Majority

p. 715
Anthony Solarz, Respondent, v. The Manhattan Railway Co. Appellant.

Headnote

Appeal from a judgment entered on the verdict of a jury, and from an order denying defendant’s motion for a new trial.
For opinion of trial judge, see 8 Mise. Rep. 656.
Lewies,- Short <& Townsend ■ {Ldward W. Thomas, of counsel), for appellant.
John L. Brower, for respondent.

The judgment and order are affirmed, with costs, on the opinion filed by McAdam, J., the learned trial judge, upon the denial of the motion for a new trial.

Present: Freedman and Gildersleeve, JJ.

Judgment and order affirmed, with costs.