Hyperlawhypertext legal databasebeta Pullam v. Greater Eagle Wet Wash-Laundry Co. 137 Misc. 103

← Cases

Pullam v. Greater Eagle Wet Wash-Laundry Co.

137 Misc. 103 Court Supreme Court, Appellate Term, Second Department, Decision date 1930-06-02 English

Contents

Majority

p. 103
William O. Pullam, Appellant, v. Greater Eagle Wet Wash-Laundry Company, Respondent.
Supreme Court, Appellate Term, Second Department,
June 2, 1930.
p. 104
James E. Smith, Jr., for the appellant.
Jacob M. Mandelbaum [Sidney Handler of counsel], for the respondent.

Judgment unanimously reversed upon the law and new trial granted, with thirty dollars costs to appellant to abide the event.

The judgment in favor of Guglielmo against the plaintiff, in an action in which the plaintiff and the defendant in this suit were parties defendant, was not res adjudicata as to the issues involved in the instant suit (Self v. International Railway Co., 224 App. Div. 238 ; Report of Appellate Term, No. 23, January term, 1930.) No opinion.