Hyperlawhypertext legal databasebeta LaSalle Extension University v. Pappace 152 Misc. 274

← Cases

LaSalle Extension University v. Pappace

152 Misc. 274 Court Supreme Court, Appellate Term, First Department, Decision date 1934-06-21 English

Contents

Majority

p. 274
LaSalle Extension University, Appellant, v. Joseph Pappace, Respondent.
Supreme Court, Appellate Term, First Department,
June 21, 1934.
Reuben S. Levins, for the appellant.
Fred Goldman, for the respondent.

Once a case has been settled pursuant to stipulation it is finally terminated and may not be set down for trial on motion. The defendant, respondent’s remedy is not a motion to set aside the judgment entered pursuant to such settlement.

p. 275
He may bring suit for breach of the terms of such stipulation. (Naegeli Furniture Co. v. Holstein, 175 N. Y. Supp. 779 , and cases cited therein.)

Order reversed, with ten dollars costs, and motion denied.

All concur; present, Callahan, Frankenthaler and Shientag, JJ.