Morkel v. Metropolitan Life Insurance — 163 Misc. 366

Majority

p. 366

Joseph Morkel, Respondent, v. Metropolitan Life Insurance Company, Appellant.

Supreme Court, Appellate Term, First Department,

November 29, 1934.

Tanner, Sillcocks & Friend, for the appellant.

R. John Urevich, for the respondent.

We think the provision against assignment of the policy was plain and unambiguous, and must be enforced as written. (Sacks v. Neptune Meter Co., 144 Misc. 70 ; affd., 238 App. Div. 82 ; Heffernan v. Prudential Insurance Co., 88 Misc. 93 .)

Judgment and order reversed, with ten dollars costs to appellant to abide the event, and motion denied.

All concur. Present — Lydon, Hammer and Shientag, JJ.

Cases cited

Sacks v. Neptune Meter Co. 144 Misc. 70 N.Y. App. Term 1932-06-23 p. 366
Heffernan v. Prudential Insurance 88 Misc. 93 N.Y. Sup. Ct. p. 366