Hyperlawhypertext legal databasebeta Pirkner v. Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Co. 171 Misc. 2

← Cases

Pirkner v. Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Co.

171 Misc. 2 Court Supreme Court, Appellate Term, First Department, Decision date 1939-04-21 English

Contents

Majority

p. 2
Ernst H. Pirkner, Appellant, v. Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Company, Respondent.
Supreme Court, Appellate Term, First Department,
April 21, 1939.
Leo D. Politzer [Morris Pottish of counsel], for the appellant.
E. C. Sherwood [Richard J. Relyea of counsel], for the respondent.

As the order appealed from is a mere ruling of the trial court it is not appealable. (Kramer v. United States F. & G. Co., 212 App. Div. 644 .) Subdivision 7 of section 154 of the Municipal Court Code, providing for appeal by permission from “ any other order ” than those specifically appealable under said section, does not warrant an appeal by permission from a mere ruling on the trial.

Appeal dismissed and cause remitted to the court below for trial.

All concur. Present — McCook, Hammer and Franken-THALER, JJ.