Hyperlawhypertext legal databasebeta Translateur v. United States Lines Co. 179 Misc. 843

← Cases

Translateur v. United States Lines Co.

179 Misc. 843 Court Supreme Court, Appellate Term, First Department, Decision date 1943-01-13 English

Contents

Majority

p. 843
Salo Translateur, Respondent-Appellant, v. United States Lines Company, Appellant-Respondent.[1]
Supreme Court, Appellate Term, First Department,
January 13, 1943.
Alexander J. Lekus for plaintiff-respondent-appellant.
William H. Postner for defendant-appellant-respondent.

Plaintiff under the evidence was not entitled to recover as the law of the place where the contract was made was impliedly a part thereof and controlled and limited the rights of the parties thereunder.

On plaintiff’s appeal judgment as amended dismissing first cause of action affirmed. On defendant’s appeal said judgment for plaintiff on the second cause of action reversed, with thirty dollars costs, and the second cause of action dismissed on the merits, with costs.

Hammer, Miller and McLaughlin, JJ., concur.