Majority
A claimant against the estate of deceased was represented originally by Milton Levin, as attorney. His claim was dismissed after a hearing before the court and a decree of dismissal was thereafter entered. Later, the claimant, acting for himself, made a motion for a new trial and in due course such motion was denied by order of this court filed February 23,1943. A copy of this order denying the application for a new trial was served upon the claimant personally by the successful estate representative. Thereafter the claimant retained another attorney who subscribed a notice of appeal from the order denying the application for a new trial. The estate representative returned this notice of appeal on the ground that the new attorney had no authority to appear for
The authority of the attorney who- first appeared for the claimant terminated with the decree originally made. The procedure of the claimant in his own behalf on the application for a rehearing was entirely correct. Equally so was it correct for him to serve a notice of appeal subscribed by a new attorney. (Magnolia Metal Co. v. Sterlingworth Ry. Co., 37 App. Div. 366 ; Davis v. Solomon, 25 Misc. 695 ; Slepin v. Beck, 84 Misc. 254 ; Title Guaranty & Trust Co. v. Uniform Fibrous Talc Co., 127 Misc. 183 , 187.)
Submit, on notice, order validating the service heretofore made of the notice of appeal.
Cases cited
- Magnolia Metal Co. v. Sterlingworth Railway-Supply Co. 37 App. Div. 366 p. 783
- Davis v. Solomon 25 Misc. 695 p. 783
- Slepin v. Beck 84 Misc. 254 p. 783
- Title Guaranty & Trust Co. v. Uniform Fibrous Talc Co. 127 Misc. 183 at 187 p. 783