Hyperlawhypertext legal databasebeta Freeman v. 103 East 86th Street Realty Corp. 196 Misc. 297

← Cases

Freeman v. 103 East 86th Street Realty Corp.

196 Misc. 297 Court Supreme Court, Special Term, New York County, Decision date 1949-03-01 English

Delivered by Benvenga, J.

Contents

Majority

p. 297
Talbot O. Freeman et al., Plaintiffs, v. 103 East 86th Street Realty Corporation et al., Defendants.
Supreme Court, Special Term, New York County,
March 1, 1949.
Barney Bosenstein for plaintiffs.
E. Louis GotJielf and Bernard B. Lauren for defendants.

Motion for a temporary injunction is granted to the extent hereinafter set forth; otherwise denied. Since the defendant concedes that sixteen hours of doorman service was supplied between 1943 and 1946, it will be required to furnish an equal amount of service. The defendant will also be required to furnish twenty-four-hour elevator operator.service upon one of the passenger elevators (Goldberg v. Grant, N. Y. L. J., Nov. 4, 1948, p. 1032, col. 6, mod. 274 App. Div. 993 ). The cause will be preferred and set at the head of the Ready Calendar of Special Term, Part III, for the 4th day óf April, 1949. Settle order.