Hyperlawhypertext legal database In re the Accounting of Guaranty Trust Co. 197 Misc. 462

← Cases

In re the Accounting of Guaranty Trust Co.

197 Misc. 462 Court Supreme Court, Special Term, New York County, Decision date 1949-10-25 English

Delivered by *463 Levey, J.

Contents

Majority

p. 462
In the Matter of the Accounting of Guaranty Trust Company of New York, as Trustee under a Trust Agreement Made by Eduardo H. Gato, Jr., as Settlor. In the Matter of the Accounting of National City Bank of New York, as Original Trustee, and City Bank Farmers Trust Company, as Successor Trustee, under a Trust Agreement Made by Eduardo H. G. Marquez (also Known as Eduardo H. Gato, Jr.), as Settlor.
Supreme Court, Special Term, New York County,
October 25, 1949.
Davis Polh War dwell Sunderland & Kiendl for petitioner in first above-entitled proceeding.
Arthur J. O’Leary, as guardian ad litem for Frank E. H. Gato and another, infants, respondents in first above-entitled proceeding.
Mitchell, Capron, Marsh, Angulo S Cooney for petitioners in second above-entitled proceeding.
John L. Flynn, as guardian ad litem for Frank E. H. Gato and another, infants, respondents, in second above-entitled proceeding.
S. Pearce Browning, Jr., for Eduardo H. Gato, III, and others, respondents, in first and second above-entitled proceedings.

This is a proceeding to settle the trustee’s account and for instructions in connection with the payment of Florida and Federal estate taxes imposed upon certain trust funds, established in New York, of the settlor who died intestate, a resident of Key West, Florida, on March 8,1948.

Section 4 of chapter 25435 (No. 439) of the Laws of 1949 of Florida, enacted as of June 13, 1949, provides: “ This Act shall apply to estates of persons dying after January first, Nineteen hundred forty-eight, or to payments of estate taxes or death taxes made, or required to be made, by a fiduciary after the date of this Act shall become a law.”

The interests of the beneficiaries under the trust funds, however, having arisen out of a contract, in the form of a trust agreement, became vested upon the death of the settlor and the State of Florida cannot by legislation thereafter impair and destroy these rights (Coolidge v. Long, 282 U. S. 582 ).

Accordingly, the Florida statute is unconstitutional in its application to the trust funds here involved. The account is approved. Settle order, at which time allowances will be fixed.

Cases cited