Hyperlawhypertext legal databasebeta Bell v. Salkind 198 Misc. 613

← Cases

Bell v. Salkind

198 Misc. 613 Court Supreme Court, Appellate Term, Second Department, Decision date 1950-10-19 English

Contents

Majority

p. 613
Peter Bell, Respondent, v. Philip Salkind et al., Appellants.
Supreme Court, Appellate Term, Second Department,
October 19, 1950.
p. 614
Jacob Wenafsbij- for appellants.
Abel Just for respondent.

The complaint fails to state a cause of action. The order denying defendant’s motion for summary judgment should be unanimously reversed on the law, with $10 costs, and motion granted, with $10 costs to defendants.

Steinbbink, Pennelly and Rubenstein, JJ., concur.

Order reversed, etc.