Reinertsen v. Erie Railroad — 66 Misc. 229

Majority

p. 229

Michael Reinertsen, Plaintiff, v. The Erie Railroad Company, Defendant.

(Supreme Court, Queens Special Term,

February, 1910.)

Headnote

Calendar: Order on calendar—'Preference: Proceedings to obtain

preference—Notice of application for preference — Time for notice.

In the county of Queens, motions for a preference on the calendar made under section 973 of the Code of Civil Procedure upon any of the grounds enumerated in section 791 of said Code, must be made at the beginning of the term for which notice of trial is served; and the failure to pursue such practice operates as a waiver of the statutory right to a preference.

The Code provisions, however, are not exclusive, and the court has inherent power and authority in a proper case to grant a preference; and where, two months after a cause had been noticed for trial for a regular term of the court, a motion was made for a preference upon the calendar, upon the ground that the plaintiff was ill with a progressive disease and probably would not survive the trial of the action if compelled to wait until it was reached in its regular order upon the calendar, the order asked for was within the discretion of the court.

Motion for a preference on the calendar made after the case had been noticed for trial.

M. P. O’Connor, for plaintiff.

Stetson, Jennings & Russell, for defendant.

This is a motion for a preference, but not made till February 14, 1910, after the case had been noticed for the December, 1909, term of this court. The preference is sought upon the ground that the plaintiff is ill with a progressive disease and will probably not survive the trial of the action, if he is compelled to wait until it is reached in its regular order upon the calendar; and it is urged that the cause he preferred, not only over the issues for the December term, hut also over issues upon preceding calendars awaiting trial.

It is clearly established that, in this county, applications

p. 230

for a preference, made upon any of the grounds enumerated in section 791 of the Code of Civil Procedure, under the provisions of section 793 must he. made at the beginning .of the term for which the notice of trial is served, and the failure to make the motion at that time operates as a waiver of the statutory right to a preference. Marks v. Murphy, 27 App. Div. 160 ; Meyerson v. Levy, 117 id. 475; Gegan v. Union Trust Co., 120 id. 382; Cohen v. Ransom, 63 Misc. Rep. 378 . These Code provisions are not, however, exclusive. The court may make special rules of practice by which preferences may he allowed for causes not provided for in the Code, and as to which preferences the special rules themselves govern. Cohen v. Ransom, supra, 379 . The court has inherent power and authority, in a proper case, aside from the statutory provisions, to grant a preference (Schuman v. Brooklyn Heights R. R. Co., 71 N. Y. Supp. 1095 , 1096; affd. without opinion, 64 App. Div. 620 ); and it is recognized in the Schuman case that “ there are from time to time cases that should be preferred out of their order, and over earlier issues, though upon previous calendars, i. e. * * * where there is danger of the death of a party.”

The present application, addressed to the discretion of the court, is one in which the preference should he granted. The action, being for personal injuries, abates on the death óf the plaintiff. The moving papers contain an affidavit of a physician, which sets forth that he had examined the plaintiff on February 4, 1910; that he found him suffering from a disease of a tubercular character; that the disease is a progressive one from which plaintiff cannot recover, and that it is of such a character that, in his opinion, it will cause" the plaintiff to grow weaker and will cause his death within four months, if not earlier. On the other hand, there is nothing to indicate that a speedy trial of the case will, in any way, prejudice the rights of the defendant.

The motion for the preference is accordingly granted, and the clerk is ordered to place the cause on the ready calendar of this court for the 14th day of March, 1910, for trial.

- Motion granted.

Cases cited

Marks v. Murphy 27 App. Div. 160 N.Y. App. Div. 1898-03-25 p. 230