Hyperlawhypertext legal databasebeta People v. Stumpp 132 Misc. 2d 3

← Cases

People v. Stumpp

132 Misc. 2d 3 Court Supreme Court, Appellate Term, Second Department, Decision date 1986-05-28 English

Contents

Majority

p. 3
The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Alexander Stumpp, Appellant.
Supreme Court, Appellate Term, Second Department,
May 28,1986
APPEARANCES OF COUNSEL
Ronald C. Schule, P. C., for appellant. Patrick Henry, District Attorney (Ronald E. Lipetz of counsel), for respondent.

OPINION OF THE COURT

Memorandum.

Judgment of conviction affirmed.

Since a police officer is permitted to inspect premises selling liquor for on-premises consumption and since such inspection includes the right to inspect books and records, the defendant was properly convicted of obstructing governmental administration for refusing access to his books and records (see, Penal

p. 4
Law § 195.05; Alcoholic Beverage Control Law §§ 106, 130; Matter of Barski v State Liq. Auth., 285 App Div 996 ).

Di Paola, P. J., Slifkin and Widlitz, JJ., concur.

Statutes and regulations cited