Hyperlawhypertext legal database City of New York v. Bullock 164 Misc. 2d 1052

← Cases

City of New York v. Bullock

164 Misc. 2d 1052 Court Supreme Court, Appellate Term, Second Department, Decision date 1995-06-26 English

Contents

Majority

p. 1052
[630 NYS2d 652]
City of New York, Appellant, v John/Jane Bullock, Respondent.
Supreme Court, Appellate Term, Second Department,
June 26, 1995
APPEARANCES OF COUNSEL
Paul A. Crotty, Corporation Counsel of New York City (Pamela Seider Dolgow and John Hogrogian of counsel), for appellant. Brooklyn Legal Services Corp. A (Martin S. Needelman, Paul J. Acinapura and Terry Herman of counsel), for respondent.

OPINION OF THE COURT

Memorandum.

Order unanimously affirmed without costs for the reasons

p. 1053
stated in the opinion of Judge Diana Johnson (see, City of New York v Bullock, 159 Misc 2d 716 ).

Kassoff, P. J., Chetta and Patterson, JJ., concur.

Cases cited