Hyperlawhypertext legal databasebeta McAvoy v. Di Leo 43 Misc. 2d 164

← Cases

McAvoy v. Di Leo

43 Misc. 2d 164 Court Supreme Court, Appellate Term, Second Department, Decision date 1964-04-22 English

Contents

Majority

p. 164
Harold V. McAvoy et al., Respondents, v. Anna Di Leo et al., Appellants. (Action No. 1.) City or New Rochelle, Plaintiff, v. Frank Di Leo, Defendant. (Action No. 2.)
Supreme Court, Appellate Term, Second Department,
April 22, 1964.
p. 165
Howard H. Schrecke for appellants. Fasso & Belserene (Thomas N. Fasso of counsel), for respondents.

Section 205-a of the General Municipal Law is not available to the plaintiffs in the situation here disclosed.

The order denying defendants’ motion to dismiss the second cause of action in each complaint should be unanimously reversed, without costs, and motion granted.

Concur — Benjamin, Gulotta and McDonald, JJ.

Order reversed, etc.

Statutes and regulations cited