Hyperlawhypertext legal database Uni-Serv Corp. v. Frede 53 Misc. 2d 644

← Cases

Uni-Serv Corp. v. Frede

53 Misc. 2d 644 Court Supreme Court, Appellate Term, First Department, Decision date 1967-03-16 English

Contents

Majority

p. 644
Uni-Serv Corp., Appellant, v. Albert W. Frede, Respondent.
Supreme Court, Appellate Term, First Department,
March 16, 1967.
Royall, Koegel & Rogers (William J. Ryan and Joseph H. Spam of counsel), for appellant. Van B. Kruchten for respondent.

We affirm on the ground that plaintiff has failed to establish the existence of the contract on which it sued. We reach no other issue.

The judgment should be affirmed, with $25 costs.

Concur — Hecht, Jr., J. P., Gold and Hopstadter, JJ.

Judgment affirmed, etc.