Hyperlawhypertext legal database Lutensqui v. Sussman 8 Misc. 2d 902

← Cases

Lutensqui v. Sussman

8 Misc. 2d 902 Court Supreme Court, Appellate Term, First Department, Decision date 1957-02-07 English

Judges Hecht, Aurelio and Tilzer, JJ., concur.

Contents

Majority

p. 902
Sophia Lutensqui, Respondent, v. I. J. Sussman, Appellant.
Supreme Court, Appellate Term, First Department,
February 7, 1957.
E. Edan Spencer and Robert D. Foglia for appellant.
Seymour J. Goldman and Abraham J. Yasgour for respondent.

The testimony of plaintiff and that of her lay witness, unsupported by expert testimony, is not sufficient to overcome the expert testimony of defendant that the dentures have been adjusted and the teeth are in proper occlusion (Young v. Wybrant, 61 N. Y. S. 2d 473 ).

The judgment should be reversed and a new trial ordered, without costs.

Hecht, Aurelio and Tilzer, JJ., concur.

Judgment reversed, etc.