McKenna v. East River Ferry Co. — 113 N.Y. 636

Majority

p. 636

Mary E. McKenna, as Administratrix, etc., Appellant, v. The East River Ferry Company, Respondent.

(Argued March 13, 1889;

decided April 16, 1889.)

Headnote

Appeal from judgment of the General Term of the Supreme Court in the second judicial department, entered upon an order made May 9,. 1887, which affirmed a judgment, entered upon •an order dismissing the complaint, and affirmed an order denying a motion for a new trial.

p. 637

Eugene Burlingame for appellant.

Nathan Bijur for respondent.

Agree to affirm; no opinion.

All concur, except Ruger, Ch. J., Andrews and Danforth,. JJ., dissenting.

Judgment affirmed.