Hyperlawhypertext legal database Fithian v. Wheeler 125 N.Y. 696

← Cases

Fithian v. Wheeler

125 N.Y. 696 Court N.Y. Decision date 1890-12-16 English

Judges All concur.

Delivered by O’Brien, J.,

Contents

Majority

p. 696
David A. Fithian, Respondent, v. George S. Wheeler, as Executor, etc., et al., Appellants. Same v. Same. John O’Brien, Respondent, v. Patrick Harden, Appellant. John H. Martenhoff, Respondent, v. George W. Bird et al., Appellants. Michael H. Haggerty, Respondent, v. George S. Wheeler, as Executor, etc., Appellant. Hugh D. Kelly, Respondent, v. George S. Wheeler et al., Appellants. Adam Lamb, Respondent, v. John Cahill, Appellant. Adam Lamb, Respondent, v. John McCamphill, Appellant. Adam Lamb, Respondent, v. John Boehm, Appellant. Ira O. Miller, Respondent, v. Nancy B. Wheeler, Impleaded, etc., Appellant. Ira O. Miller, Respondent, v. Nancy B. Wheeler, Impleaded, etc., Appellant. Ira O. Miller, Respondent, v. Nancy B. Wheeler, Impleaded, etc., Appellant. Ira O. Miller, Respondent, v. Nancy B. Wheeler, Impleaded, etc., Appellant. Ira O. Miller, Respondent, v. Nancy B. Wheeler, Impleaded, etc., Appellant. Ira O. Miller, Respondent, v. Nancy B. Wheeler, Impleaded, etc., Appellant. Harry Wallerstein, Respondent, v. John Bohanna et al., Appellants.
(Submitted December 3, 1890;
decided December 16, 1890.)

Headnote

Appeals from judgments of the General Term of the City-Court of Brooklyn, entered upon orders made January 28, 1889, which affirmed judgments in favor of the plaintiffs entered upon decisions of the court on trial at Special Term.
These were actions of ejectment to recover certain lands in the city of Brooklyn to which plaintiffs claimed title through sales for taxes under chapter 114 of the Laws of 1883.
p. 697
A. H. & W. II. Osborn for appellants,
John T. Barnard for respondents.

The following is an extract from the mem. of opinion :

“The questions involved are the constitutionality of the above statute and the validity of the sales thereunder. These questions have been, determined in this court in recent cases adverse to the defendants. (Terrel v. Wheeler, 123 N. Y. 76 ; Lamb v. Connolly and Lamb v. Lancy, 122 id. 531.)

“The judgment in all the cases should, therefore, be affirmed.”

reads for affirmance.

All concur.

Judgments affirmed.

Cases cited