← Cases

Lough v. Outerbridge

145 N.Y. 601 Court N.Y. Decision date 1895-02-26 English

Contents

Majority

p. 601
Ernest St. George Lough et al., Survivors, etc., Appellants, v. A. Emilius Outerbridge et al., Respondents.
(Argued June 20, 1894
; decided October 9, 1894;
re-argument ordered;
re-argued February 7, 1895;
decided February 26, 1895.)

Headnote

Appeal from judgment of the General Term of the Supreme Court in the first judicial department, entered upon an order
p. 602
made April 14, 1893, which affirmed a judgment in favor of defendants entered upon a decision of the court on trial at Special Term.
This case is reported on former argument, 143 N. Y. 271 ; on re-argument, 144 id. 642.
Treadwell Clevelcmd for appellants.
Wilhelmus Mynderse for respondents.

Agree to affirm on opinion by O’Brien, J., on original argument ( 143 N. Y. 271 ).

All concur, except Andrews, Ch. J., and Peckham, J., dissenting.

Judgment affirmed.

Cases cited