Hyperlawhypertext legal databasebeta Broadbelt v. Loew 162 N.Y. 642

← Cases

Broadbelt v. Loew

162 N.Y. 642 Court N.Y. Decision date 1900-04-17 English

Judges Concur: Geay, O’Brien, Haight, Landon, Cullen and Weeneb, JJ. Not sitting: Pabkee, Ch. J.

Contents

Majority

p. 642
William Broadbelt, Respondent, v. Sarah L. Loew, Appellant.

Headnote

Broadbelt v. Loew, 15 App. Div. 343 , affirmed.
(Argued March 30, 1900;
decided April 17, 1900.)
Appeal from a judgment and order of- the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the first judicial depart
p. 643
ment, entered, respectively, April 19 and March 5, 1897, reversing a judgment in favor of defendant entered upon a dismissal of the complaint by the court at Special Term and directing judgment for the plaintiff.
David McClure for appellant.
John Frankenheimer for respondent.

Judgment and order affirmed, with costs, on opinion below,

Concur: Geay, O’Brien, Haight, Landon, Cullen and Weeneb, JJ. Not sitting: Pabkee, Ch. J.

Cases cited