Hyperlawhypertext legal database Spink v. Corning 172 N.Y. 626

← Cases

Spink v. Corning

172 N.Y. 626 Court N.Y. Decision date 1902-10-31 English

Contents

Majority

p. 626
George Spink, Respondent, v. Anna Corning, Appellant, Impleaded with Another.

Headnote

Spink v. Corning, 61 App. Div. 84 , affirmed.
(Argued October 15, 1902;
decided October 31, 1902.)
Appeal from a judgment of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the fourth judicial department, entered May 8,1901, affirming a judgment in favor of plaintiff entered upon a decision of the court on trial at an Equity Term.
John Van Voorhis and Brown dt Poole for appellant.
George J). Reed for respondent.

Judgment affirmed, but as the court think the damages in this case are excessive and as this court cannot reverse on that

p. 627
account or reduce the damages, the affirmance is without costs; no opinion.

Concur: Parker, Ch. J., Gray, Bartlett, Haight, Mártir and Culler, JJ. Not voting : Werrer, J.

Cases cited