Hyperlawhypertext legal database Goldmark v. Magnolia Anti-Friction Metal Co. 172 N.Y. 645

← Cases

Goldmark v. Magnolia Anti-Friction Metal Co.

172 N.Y. 645 Court N.Y. Decision date 1902-11-18 English

Contents

Majority

p. 645
Adolph Goldmark, Respondent, v. The Magnolia Anti-Friction Metal Company, Appellant, Impleaded with Another.

Headnote

Reported below, 71 App. Div. 617 .
(Submitted November 10, 1902;
decided November 18, 1902.)
Motion to dismiss an appeal from a judgment of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the first judicial department, entered May 15, 1902, affirming a judgment in
p. 646
favor of plaintiff entered upon a verdict and an order denying a motion for a new trial.
The motion was made upon the grounds that the exceptions are frivolous and the appeal taken for delay.
L. A. Gould for motion.
Alexander S. Bacon opposed.

Motion denied, with ten dollars costs.