Hyperlawhypertext legal database Goldmark v. Magnolia Anti-Friction Metal Co. 175 N.Y. 476

← Cases

Goldmark v. Magnolia Anti-Friction Metal Co.

175 N.Y. 476 Court N.Y. Decision date 1903-05-19 English

Contents

Majority

p. 476
Adolph Goldmark, Respondent, v. Magnolia Anti-Friction Metal Company, Appellant.

Headnote

Goldmark v. Magnolia Ante-Friction Metal Co., 71 App. Div. 617 , affirmed.
(Submitted May 5, 1903;
decided May 19, 1903.)
Appeal from a judgment of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the first judicial department, entered
p. 477
May 15, 1902, affirming a judgment in favor of plaintiff entered upon a verdict and an order denying a motion for a new trial.
Alexander S. Bacon and Murphy c& Metcalf for appellant.
John Frankenheimer and Constant & Coghill for respondent.

Judgment affirmed, with costs; no opinion.

Concur: Parker, Ch. J., Gray, O’Brien, Bartlett, Haight, Martin and Vann, JJ.