Majority
p. 578Maurice J. Katz, Appellant, v. The H. & H. Manufacturing Company, Respondent. (Argued January 10, 1906; decided January 30, 1906.)
Headnote
Katz v. H. & H. Manufacturing Co., 109 App. Div. 49 , affirmed.Appeal, by permission, from an order of the. Appellate Division of the.Supreme Court in the first judicial department, entered December 12, 1905, which reversed an order of Special Term continuing a preliminary injunction to restrain the election of directors of the defendant company.
The following questions were certified :. ,
“(1) The by-laws of the defendant'. corporation provide that the directors shall be five in number, and also, provide that£ stockholders by a, vote of ninety per cent of the stock issued and outstanding may at any regular or special meeting, alter or amend’ the by-laws.'" A meeting was. duly called for the purpose of adopting a resolution to decrease the number of directors from five to four and to amend the provision of the by-laws by substituting the word ‘ four ’ for the word ‘five’ with respect to the number of directors." -The holders' and ■ owners of more' than, fifty per cent -of the issued and outstanding .stock of the defendant, but less than1- niuéty' per cent of such stock, duly voted voted in favor of this resolution.
“ Was it lawful for the company to reduce its number of directors by a vote of the holders of more than, fifty -per cent but less than ninety per cent of the issued and outstanding stock of the defendant where all the statutory requirements have been complied with ?
“ (2) Is it lawful for a corporation to provide in its by-laws that a vote of the holders of ninety per cent (90%) of its issued and outstanding stock shall be required in order to change the number of directors, notwithstanding section 21 of the Stock Corporation Law ? ” . ■
Herbert R. Limburger for appellant.
William H. Hirsh for respondent.
p. 579
Order affirmed, with costs. ■ First question certified answered in the affirmative, second in the negative; no opinion.
Concur: Cullen, Ch. J., O’Brien, Haight, Vann, Werner, Willard Bartlett and Hisoock, JJ.
Cases cited
- Katz v. H. & H. Manufacturing Co. 109 App. Div. 49 p. 578