Hyperlawhypertext legal databasebeta Vroom v. Sage 184 N.Y. 542

← Cases

Vroom v. Sage

184 N.Y. 542 Court N.Y. Decision date 1906-02-27 English

Contents

Majority

p. 542
Robert D. Vroom, Respondent, v. Russell Sage, Appellant.

Headnote

Vroom v. Sage, 100 App. Div. 285 , affirmed.
(Argued February 1, 1906;
decided February 27, 1906.)
Appeal from a judgment of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the first judicial department, entered January 16, 1905, affirming a judgment.in favor of plaintiff entered upon a verdict and an order denying a motion for a new trial.
p. 543
George W. Wicker sham,, Sidney Smith and Charles A. Gardiner for appellant.
Henry D. Hotchkiss for respondent.

Judgment affirmed, with costs; no opinion.

Concur: Cullen, Ch. J., Gray, O’Brien, Edward T. Bartlett, Werner, Hisoook and Chase, JJ.

Cases cited