Nathan v. Uhlmann — 184 N.Y. 606

Majority

p. 606

Harold Nathan, as Administrator of the Estate of Martin Cassidy, Deceased, Respondent, v. Simon Uhlmann, as Executor of Frederick Uhlmann, Deceased, Appellant, Impleaded with Others.

Headnote

Nathan v. Uhlmann, 101 App. Div. 388 , affirmed.

(Argued Match 27, 1006;

decided April 17, 1906.)

Appeal from an order of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the. first judicial department, entered February 18,1905, which reversed a-judgment in favor of defendant entered upon a verdict and an order denying a motion for a new trial and granted a new trial.

William A. Jenner and Oscar W. Jeffrey for appellant.

Harold Nathan for respondent.

Order affirmed and judgment absolute ordered against defendant on the stipulation, with costs in all courts; no opinion.

Concur: Cullen, Ch. J., Gbay, Edwabd T. Babtlett, Weeneb, Hiscook and Chase, JJ. Absent: O’Bbien, J.

Cases cited

Nathan v. Uhlmann 101 App. Div. 388 N.Y. App. Div. 1905-02-10 p. 606