Majority
p. 613Frank Lane, Respondent, v. The New York Central and Hudson River Railroad Company, Appellant. (Argued April 22, 1907; decided May 7, 1907.)
Headnote
Lane v. N. Y. C. & H. R. R. R. Co., 113 App. Div. 904 , affirmed.Appeal from a judgment of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the fourth judicial department, entered April 25, 1906, affirming a judgment in favor of plaintiff entered upon a verdict and an order denying a motion for a new trial in an action to recover for personal injuries alleged to have been caused by defendant’s negligence.
Henry Purcell for appellant.
W. F. Rreen for respondent.
Judgment affirmed, with costs, on authority of McGoy v. FT. 7. G. db II. R. R. R. Go. ( 185 N. Y. 276 ); no opinion.
Concur: Cullen, Ch. J., Edward T. Bartlett, Haight, ■ W erner and W illard Bartlett, JJ. Not sitting: Gray, J. Absent: Hiscock, J.
Cases cited
- McCoy v. New York Central & Hudson River Railroad 185 N. Y. 276 p. 613