In re Milliken — 195 N.Y. 568

Majority

p. 568

In the Matter of the Application of Seth M. Milliken, Appellant, for the Vacation or Reduction of an Assessment. The City of New York, Respondent.

Headnote

Matter of Milttken, 130 App. Div. 880 , affirmed.

(Argued April 26, 1909;

decided May 11, 1909.)

Appeal from an order of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the first judicial department, entered Janu

p. 569

ary 22, 1909, which affirmed an order of Special Term denying a motion to vacate or reduce an assessment on the petitioner’s property for the improvement of Edgecombe avenue in the city of New York.

James P. Davenport for appellant.

Franeis K. Pendleton, Corporation Counsel (Theodore Connóly and Ceorge L. Sterling of counsel), for respondent.

Order affirmed, with costs; no opinion.

Concur: Gray, Edward T. Bartlett, Haight, Vann, Werner and Chase, JJ. Absent: Cullen, Ch. J.