Hyperlawhypertext legal database Benvegna v. United Surety Co. 196 N.Y. 563

← Cases

Benvegna v. United Surety Co.

196 N.Y. 563 Court N.Y. Decision date 1909-11-23 English

Contents

Majority

p. 563
Pietro Benveg-na, Respondent, v. United Surety Company, Appellant.

Headnote

Bemegna v. United Surety Co., 132 App. Div. 925 , affirmed.
(Argued October 5, 1909;
decided November 23, 1909.)
Appeal, by permission, from an order of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the first judicial department, entered May 14, 1909, which' reversed a judgment of
p. 564
Special Term overruling a demurrer to the answer and dismissing the complaint in an action to recover upon a surety bond.
The following question was certified: “ Does the plaintiff's complaint set forth facts sufficient to constitute a cause of action ? ”
Edwin Bhmenstiel for appellant.
Nelson L. Keach for respondent.

Order affirmed, with costs; question certified answered in the affirmative on opinion in case of Musco v. United Surety Co. ( 196 N. Y. 459 ).

Concur: Cullen, Ch. J., Edward T. Babtlett, Haight, Vann. Willard Bartlett, Hiscook and Chase, JJ.

Cases cited