← Cases

Schieffelin v. McClellan

197 N.Y. 610 Court N.Y. Decision date 1910-02-15 English

Contents

Majority

p. 610
William J. Schieffelin, Appellant, v. George B. McClellan et al., Composing the Board of Estimate and Apportionment of the City of New York, et al., Respondents.

Headnote

Schieffelin v. McClellan, 135 App. Div. 665 , appeal dismissed.
(Argued February 8, 1910;
decided February 15, 1910.)
Appeal, by permission, from an order of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the first judicial department, entered December 22, 1909, which reversed an order of Special
p. 611
Terra granting a motion for an injunction pendente lite in a taxpayer’s action to restrain the granting of certain modifications to a franchise permitting the operation of street surface cars-over the Queens borough bridge and through certain streets in Queens borough.
Julius Henry Cohen and Albert S. Bard for appellant.
Archibald R. Watson, Corporation Counsel (Theodore Connoly and Terence Farley of counsel), for respondents.
Clarence Lexow and Arthur C. Hume for South Shore Traction Company, intervening.

Appeal dismissed, without costs, on the ground that all the proper parties are not before the court; no opinion.

Concur: Cullen, Ch. J.,Haight, Vann, Werner, Willard Bartlett, Hiscock and Chase, JJ.