Majority
Headnote
Where a justice of the supreme court at a special term made a decree in favor oí the plaintiff in an equity cause, and the defendant duly applied to the general term for a rehearing under the judiciary act of 1847, (§ 20,) and the application was denied ; held that the order of the general term was erroneous, although on the face thereof it appeared that the merits had been considered.The Court were of opinion that the order was erroneous, and thereupon the same was reversed.[1]
1 A special motion cannot be renewed, upon the same, or substantially the same facts, without leave of court. Hale v. Emmons, 39 How. Pr. 187 ; s. c. 2 Alb. L. J. 355. Snyder v. White, 6 How. Pr. 321 . Smith v. Spalding, 3 Rob. 615 ; s. c. 30 How. Pr. 339 . Bellinger v. Martindale, 8 Ibid. 113. Mills v. Thursby, 11 Ibid. 114. Dunn v. Meserole, 5 Daly 434 . Wentworth v. Wentworth, 51 How. Pr. 289 . Shultze v. Rodewald, 1 Abb. N. C. 365 . Otherwise, if based upon a new state of facts. Belmont v. Erie Railway Co., 52 Barb. 637 . Erie Railway Co. v. Ramsey, 57 Ibid. 449. Steuben County Bank v. Alburger, 83 N, Y. 274 .