Fitzgerald v. City of New York — 201 N.Y. 604

Majority

p. 604

Annie M. Fitzgerald, Respondent, v. The City of New York, Appellant.

Headnote

Fitzgerald v. City of New York, 141 App. Div. 927 , affirmed.

(Argued March 24, 1911;

decided April 7, 1911.)

Appeal, by permission, from a judgment of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the first judicial depart

p. 605

ment, entered December 9, 1910, affirming a judgment in favor of plaintiff entered upon a decision of the court at a Trial Term without a jury in an action to recover a deficiency in salary alleged to be due the plaintiff.

Archibald li. Watson, Corporation Counsel (Clarence L. Barber and Theodore Connoly of counsel), for appellant.

George M. Curtis and Charles E. Hill for respondent.

Judgment affirmed, with costs; no opinion.

Concur: Cullen, Ch. J., Gray, Haight, Vann, Werner, Hiscook and Collin, JJ.