Hyperlawhypertext legal databasebeta Boldt v. A. M. & W. H. Wiles Co. 206 N.Y. 665

← Cases

Boldt v. A. M. & W. H. Wiles Co.

206 N.Y. 665 Court N.Y. Decision date 1912-06-29 English

Judges Concur: Cullen, Oh. J., Haight, Vann, Werner, Willard Bartlett and Chase, JJ. Absent: Gray, J.

Contents

Majority

p. 665
John G. Boldt, Respondent, v. The A. M. & W. H. Wiles Company, Appellant.
(Argued June 18, 1912;
decided June 29, 1912.)

Headnote

Boldt v. Wiles Co., 142 App. Div. 903 , affirmed.
Appeal from a judgment of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the second judicial department, entered December 30, 1910, modifying and affirming as modified a judgment in favor of plaintiff entered upon a verdict in an action to recover for personal injuries alleged to have been sustained by plaintiff through the negligence of defendant, his employer.
p. 666
Louis Marshall and James B. Henney for appellant.
Lewis E. Carr and Abram E. Bervin for respondent.

Judgment affirmed, with costs; no opinion.

Concur: Cullen, Oh. J., Haight, Vann, Werner, Willard Bartlett and Chase, JJ. Absent: Gray, J.