Kridel v. Bloomingdale — 208 N.Y. 569

Majority

p. 569

Samuel Kridel et al., as Executors of Abraham M. Kridel, Deceased, Respondents, v. Emanuel W. Bloomingdale, Appellant.

Headnote

Kridel v. Bloomingdale, 149' App. Div. 605, affirmed.

(Argued April 1, 1913;

decided April 15, 1913.)

Appeal from an order of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the first judicial department, entered

p. 570

March 8, 1912, reversing a judgment in favor of defendant entered upon a dismissal of the complaint by the court at a Trial Term and granting a new trial in an action on contract.

Daniel P. Hays and B. B. Gattell for appellant.

Barnett L. Hollander for respondents.

Order affirmed and judgment absolute ordered against appellant on the stipulation, with costs in all courts; no opinion.

Concur: Cullen, Ch. J., Willaed Bartlett, Hiscock, Chase, Cuddeback and Hogan, JJ. Not sitting: Miller, J.