Rouse v. Lake Shore & Michigan Southern Railway Co.

Majority

p. 602

Minnie Rouse, Appellant, v. Lake Shore and Michigan Southern Railway Company, Respondent.

Headnote

Rouse v. Rake Shore & M. S. Ry. Co., 151 App. Div. 902 , affirmed.

(Argued November ,21, 1913;

decided December 9, 1913.)

Appeal from a judgment entered June 22, 1912, upon an order of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the fourth judicial department, overruling plaintiff’s exceptions, ordered- to be heard in the first instance by

p. 603

the Appellate Division, denying a motion for a new trial and directing judgment for defendant upon the nonsuit granted at the Trial Term in an action to recover for personal injuries alleged to have been sustained by plaintiff through the negligence of defendant.

Elijah W. Holt for appellant.

Thomas D. Powell for respondent.

Judgment affirmed, with costs; no opinion.

Concur: Cullen, Ch. J., Cray, Willard Bartlett, Hiscock, Chase, Collin and Miller, JJ.