Majority
p. 627Mary E. Potter, Respondent, v. Fred R. Engert, Appellant. (Submitted February 13, 1914; decided March 24, 1914.)
Headnote
Potter v. Engert, 151 App. Div. 897 , affirmed.Appeal from a judgment of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the fourth judicial department,
p. 628
entered May 10, 1912, affirming a judgment in favor of plaintiff entered upon a decision of the court at a Trial Term without a jury in an action to restrain the defendant from interfering with a line fence between property belonging to his wife and the plaintiff’s property and for damages.
F. E. Converse and E. W. Hamn for appellant.
Clyde W. Knapp for respondent.
Judgment affirmed,' with costs; no opinion.
Concur: Willard Bartlett, Ch. J., Hiscock, Chase, Cuddeback, Hogan, Miller and Cardozo, JJ.