Cossman v. Chenango Silk Co. — 211 N.Y. 509

Majority

p. 509

Alfred Cossman, Appellant, v. Chenango Silk Company, Respondent.

Headnote

Cossman v. Chenango Silk Co., 150 App. Div. 895 ,' affirmed.'

(Argued March 25, 1914;

decided April 14, 1914.)

Appeal from a judgment of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the third judicial department, entered April 12, 1912, affirming a judgment in favor of defendant entered , upon a verdict in an action to recover for an alleged breach, of contract.

p. 510

Henry B. Twombly and Edmonds Putney for appellant.

Harvey D. Hinman for respondent.

Judgment affirmed, with costs; r£o opinion.

Concur: Willakd Bartlett, Oh. J., Werner, Chase, Collin, Ouddebaok, Hogan and Cardozo, JJ.