Hyperlawhypertext legal databasebeta In re Hollander 212 N.Y. 594

← Cases

In re Hollander

212 N.Y. 594 Court N.Y. Decision date 1914-10-13 English

Contents

Majority

p. 594
In the Matter of the Application of Barnett L. Hollander et al., Respondents, to Have Determined and Enforced Their Lien for Services as Attorneys for Isaac Voron et al., Appellants.

Headnote

Matter of Hollander, 163 App. Div. 952 , affirmed.
(Argued September 29, 1914;
decided October 13, 1914.)
Appeal from an order of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the first judicial department, entered
p. 595
June 19, 1914, which affirmed an order of Special Term fixing the value of certain services rendered by petitioners as attorneys. Also motion to dismiss said appeal.
Alexander Thain and Louis I. Grossfield for appellants.
Barnett L. Hollander and Edgar J. Bernheimer for respondents.

Motion denied. Order affirmed, with costs; no opinion.'

Concur: Werner, Hiscock, Chase, Collin, Hogan, ■ Miller and Cardozo, JJ.