Connell v. Jankelson — 213 N.Y. 645

Majority

p. 645

Margaret Connell, Respondent, v. Samuel Jankelson, Appellant, Impleaded with Others.

(Submitted November 9, 1914;

decided November 17, 1914.)

Headnote

Reported below, 163 App. Div. 592 .

Motion to dismiss an appeal from a judgment of the Appellate Division.of the Supreme Court in the second judicial department, entered August 7, 1914, affirming a judgment in favor of plaintiff entered upon a verdict in an action to recover for personal injuries alleged to have been sustained by plaintiff through the negligence of defendants.

The motion was made upon the ground that the Appellate Division had unanimously decided that there

p. 646

was evidence sufficient to sustain the verdict and that the exceptions were frivolous.

Henry M. Dater for motion.

Hugo Hirsh opposed.

Motion denied, with ten dollars costs.