Hyperlawhypertext legal database Curtis v. Hudson Valley Railway Co. 213 N.Y. 681

← Cases

Curtis v. Hudson Valley Railway Co.

213 N.Y. 681 Court N.Y. Decision date 1915-01-05 English

Contents

Majority

p. 681
Mary L. N. Curtis, as Executrix of Pierson C. Curtis, Deceased, Respondent, v. Hudson Valley Railway Company, Appellant.
(Argued December 7, 1914;
decided January 5, 1915.)

Headnote

Curtis v. Hudson Valley Railway Co., 158 App. Div. 373 , affirmed.
Appeal from a judgment of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the third judicial department, entered September 16,1913, affirming a judgment in favor of plaintiff entered upon verdict in an action to recover for the death of plaintiff’s intestate alleged to have been occasioned through the negligence of defendant.
Lewis E. Carr and James McPhillips for appellant.
Edgar T. Brackett and John B. Holmes for respondent.

Judgment affirmed, with costs; no opinion.

Concur: Willard Bartlett, Ch. J., Chase, Hogan, Miller and Cardozo, JJ.; Hiscock, J., dissents on the ground that improper evidence was received that the whistle did not blow and concerning the earnings of the decedent.

Cases cited