Majority
p. 645Caroline A. Hoagland, Respondent, v. George Leask et al., as Trustees, under the Will of Hudson Hoagland, Deceased, et al., Respondents, and Edmund Batchis, Appellant. (Submitted February 5, 1915; decided February 25, 1915.)
Headnote
Hoagland v. Leask, 154 App. Div. 101 , affirmed.Appeal from a judgment of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the first judicial department,
p. 646
entered February 4, 1913, reversing a judgment in favor of defendants entered upon a dismissal of the complaint by the court at Special Term and directing judgment. in favor of plaintiff in an action by a divorced wife to compel trustees to pay to her part of certain income payable under the terms of the trust to her former husband.
Henry W. Baird for appellant.
Joseph W. Middlebrook for plaintiff, respondent.
J. Hampden Dougderty for defendants, respondents.
Judgment affirmed, with costs; no opinion.
Concur: Willard Bartlett, Ch. J., Hiscock, Chase, Cuddebaok, Hogan, Miller and Seabury, JJ.