Majority
p. 668Hudson and Manhattan Railroad Company, Respondent, v. Humboldt Exploration Company et al., Defendants, and Edwin H. Snyder, Appellant. (Argued May 10, 1915; decided May 25, 1915.)
Headnote
Hudson & Manhattan B. B. Co. v. Snyder, 156 App. Div. 935 , affirmed.Appeal from a judgment of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the first judicial department, entered
p. 669
May 13, 1918, affirming a judgment in favor of plaintiff entered upon a decision of the court at a Trial Term without a jury in an action to recover upon a promissory note. The defense of defendant Snyder was that he was an accommodation indorser on a note given without consideration in renewal of a note already merged in a judgment; i. e., a former adjudication of and money judgment for the indebtedness.
Jacob Landy and Isaac N. Miller for appellant.
Lansing P. Peed for respondent.
Judgment affirmed, with costs; no opinion.
Concur: Willard Bartlett, Ch. J., Werner, Chase, OUDDEBACK, ÜOGAN, MILLER and SeABURY, JJ.