Hyperlawhypertext legal database Smith v. Hedges 216 N.Y. 761

← Cases

Smith v. Hedges

216 N.Y. 761 Court N.Y. Decision date 1916-01-04 English

Contents

Majority

p. 761
S. Dimon Smith, Respondent, v. Dayton Hedges, Appellant. Same, Respondent, v. Same, Appellant.

Headnote

Reported below, 169 App. Div. 115 .
(Submitted January 3, 1916;
decided January 4, 1916.)
Motion, in each of the above-entitled actions, to dismiss an appeal from a judgment of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the second judicial department, entered November 24,1915, affirming a judgment in favor of plaintiff. entered upon a verdict directed by the court.
The motions were made upon the grounds that the actions were brought to recover compensation for services; that the affirmance by the Appellate Division was
p. 762
unanimous; that permission to appeal had not been obtained, and that the exceptions were frivolous.
Gustav Lange, Jr., for motion.
John B. Vunk opposed.

Motions denied, without costs.