Hyperlawhypertext legal databasebeta Wachsman v. Travelers Insurance Co. of Hartford 220 N.Y. 622

← Cases

Wachsman v. Travelers Insurance Co. of Hartford

220 N.Y. 622 Court N.Y. Decision date 1917-02-09 English

Contents

Majority

p. 622
Babetta Wachsman et al., Respondents, v. Travelers Insurance Company of Hartford, Connecticut, Appellant.

Headnote

Reported below, 175 App. Div. 981 .
(Submitted February 5, 1917;
decided February 9, 1917.)
Motion to dismiss an appeal from a judgment of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the first judicial department, entered December 26, 1916, affirm
p. 623
ing a judgment in favor of plaintiffs entered upon a verdict in an action to recover on a policy of indemnity insurance.
The motion was made upon the ground that the Appellate Division had unanimously decided that the verdict was supported by the evidence; that the exceptions were frivolous and raised no question of law for review; that permission to appeal had not been obtained,' and that the appeal was taken for purposes of delay.
Joseph Wilkenfeld for motion.
William J. Moran opposed.

Motion denied, with ten dollars costs.