Glockner v. Great Eastern Casualty Co. — 225 N.Y. 622

Majority

p. 622

Jacob Glockner et al., Doing Business as J. Glockner & Co., Respondents, v. Great Eastern Casualty Company, Appellant.

Headnote

Glockner v. Great Eastern Casualty Co., 174 App. Div. 873 , affirmed.

(Argued November 20, 1918;

decided December 10, 1918.)

Appeal from a judgment of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the first judicial department,

p. 623

entered July 8, 1916, modifying and affirming as modified a judgment in favor of plaintiffs entered upon a verdict in an action upon a policy of burglary insurance. The defendant denied that the loss was as large as claimed by plaintiff and that question presented the only issue.

I. Maurice Wopmser and Joseph L. Prager for appellant.

Otto A. Samuels for respondents.

Judgment affirmed, with costs; no opinion.

Concur: His cock, Ch. J., Collin, Cuddeback, Cardozo, Pound, Crane and Andrews, JJ.