Hyperlawhypertext legal databasebeta In re the Estate of Groot 226 N.Y. 576

← Cases

In re the Estate of Groot

226 N.Y. 576 Court N.Y. Decision date 1919-03-18 English

Contents

Majority

p. 576
In the Matter of the Estate of Cathelina E. Groot, Deceased. William R. Bleecker, as Administrator with the Will Annexed, Appellant; Egburt E. Woodbury, Attorney-General, Respondent.

Headnote

Matter of Groot, 173 App. Div. 436 , affirmed.
(Argued February 28, 1919;
decided March 18, 1919.)
Appeal from an order of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the third judicial department, entered July 17, 1916, which affirmed a decree of the Albany County Surrogate’s Court sustaining the validity of the will of Cathelina E. Groot, deceased, by paragraph “ Tenth ” of which the testatrix gave, devised and bequeathed her residuary estate to a trustee in trust to invest and reinvest the same and from the principal and income “ from time to time make such reasonable charitable donations, contributions or gifts, to such persons, corporations, associations or institutions in the town of Guilderlánd, Albany county, N. Y., as may, in the judgment of my said trustee be in need and worthy
p. 577
thereof, he having been fully advised of my purpose and inclinations in that respect.”
Michael D. Reilly and William E. Woollard for appellant.
Charles D. Newton, Attorney-General (Alex. T. Selkirk of counsel), for respondent..

Order affirmed, with costs; no opinion.

Concur: His cock, Ch. J., Chase, Collin, Cuddeback, Hogan, McLaughlin and Crane, JJ.

Cases cited