Majority
p. 625Louise Hamburger, Respondent, v. Cornell University, Appellant. (Argued April 7, 1919; decided April 22, 1919.)
Headnote
Hamburger v. Cornell University, 184 App. Div. 403 , affirmed.Appeal, by permission, from an order of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the third judicial department, entered September 27, 1918, Avhich reversed an order of Special Term sustaining a demurrer to the complaint and directing a dismissal thereof. The action was to recover for personal injuries alleged to have been sustained by plaintiff through the negligence of defendant. The complaint alleged that plaintiff Avas a pupil in the defendant university and Avhile performing an experiment in chemistry required as a part of her course under the direction of defendant’s instructors and Avith chemicals obtained from defendant’s employee, an explosion occurred causing the injuries complained of. The Special Term sustained the -demurrer on the ground that defendant was administering a government activity or function and was, therefore, absolved from liability for the negligence of its servants and agents.
The following question Avas certified: “ Does the. com
p. 626
plaint state facts sufficient to constitute a cause of action? ”
Oliver L. McCaskill and Mynderse Van ■ Cleef for appellant.
Nash Rockwood, Harry P. Pendrick and Charles A. Winter for respondent.
Order affirmed, with costs, and question certified answered in the affirmative; no opinion.
Concur: Chase, Collin, Cuddeback, Hogan, Cardozo, McLaughlin and Andrews, JJ.